Monday, March 10, 2008

Who Is The Terrorist Now?

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush said Saturday he vetoed legislation that would ban the CIA from using harsh interrogation methods such as waterboarding to break suspected terrorists because it would end practices that have prevented attacks.

"The bill Congress sent me would take away one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror," Bush said in his weekly radio address taped for broadcast Saturday. "So today I vetoed it," Bush said. The bill he rejected provides guidelines for intelligence activities for the year and has the interrogation requirement as one provision. It cleared the House in December and the Senate last month.

"This is no time for Congress to abandon practices that have a proven track record of keeping America safe," the president said.

Supporters of the legislation say it would preserve the United States' ability to collect critical intelligence while also providing a much-needed boost to country's moral standing abroad.

"Torture is a black mark against the United States," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California. "We will not stop until [the ban] becomes law."

The bill would limit CIA interrogators to the 19 techniques allowed for use by military questioners. The Army field manual in 2006 banned using methods such as waterboarding or sensory deprivation on uncooperative prisoners.

Bush said the CIA must retain use of "specialized interrogation procedures" that the military doesn't need. The military methods are designed for questioning "lawful combatants captured on the battlefield," while intelligence professionals are dealing with "hardened terrorists" who have been trained to resist the techniques in the Army manual, the president said.

"We created alternative procedures to question the most dangerous al Qaeda operatives, particularly those who might have knowledge of attacks planned on our homeland," Bush said. "If we were to shut down this program and restrict the CIA to methods in the field manual, we could lose vital information from senior al Qaeda terrorists, and that could cost American lives."

The legislation's backers say the military's approved methods are sufficient to any need.

Those 19 interrogation techniques to which the bill would have restricted CIA personnel include the "good cop/bad cop" routine, making prisoners think they are in another country's custody and separating a prisoner from others for up to 30 days.

Among the techniques the field manual prohibits are hooding prisoners or putting duct tape across their eyes, stripping them naked, forcing them to perform or mimic sexual acts, or beating, electrocuting, burning or otherwise physically hurting them.

They may not be subjected to hypothermia or mock executions. It does not allow food, water and medical treatment to be withheld. Dogs may not be used in any aspect of interrogation.

But waterboarding is the most high-profile and controversial of the interrogation methods in question.

It involves strapping a person down and pouring water over his or her cloth-covered face to simulate and create the sensation of drowning. It has been traced back hundreds of years to the Spanish Inquisition and is condemned by nations around the world and human rights organizations as torture.

Some argue it must be banned because, if torture, it is illegal under international and U.S. law. The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 includes a provision barring cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment for all detainees in U.S. custody, including CIA prisoners, and many believe that covers waterboarding.

Others say that, even if legal, there are practical arguments against waterboarding: that its use would undermine the U.S. when arguing overseas for human rights and on other moral issues and would place Americans at greater risk of being tortured when captured.

"President Bush's veto will be one of the most shameful acts of his presidency," Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, said in a statement Friday. "Unless Congress overrides the veto, it will go down in history as a flagrant insult to the rule of law and a serious stain on the good name of America in the eyes of the world."

He noted that the Army field manual contends that harsh interrogation is a "poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say what he thinks the (interrogator) wants to hear."

The U.S. military specifically prohibited waterboarding in 2006. The CIA also prohibited the practice in 2006, and says it has not been used since three prisoners encountered it in 2003.

But while some Bush administration officials have questioned the current legality of waterboarding, the administration has refused to rule definitively on whether it is torture. Bush has said many times that his administration does not torture.

The White House says waterboarding remains among the interrogation methods potentially available to the CIA. Its use would have to be approved, on a case-by-case basis, by the president after consultation with the attorney general and the intelligence community. Among the acceptable situations for approving it could be belief of imminent attack, according to the White House.

"Because the danger remains, we need to ensure our intelligence officials have all the tools they need to stop the terrorists," Bush said.

. . . . .

I'm not sure how much commentary is necessary here. Bush is saying it's okay to torture people. IT IS NOT OKAY TO TORTURE PEOPLE. How can this man really be in charge of the country. Not everyone in the world is out to get us. Violence begets violence; peace begets peace. Torture extracts highly unreliable information; even the army interrogation manual admits this.

President Bush makes me ashamed to be an American. If anyone is encouraging terrorism, it is Bush himself.

4 comments:

  1. Would you torture someone to save your families life? I guess not.

    Bush is in office because people voted him into office, that is how we run our country.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No I wouldn't torture someone to save my family. To do that is to become inhuman and deny the validity of another life.

    And Bush is the best president who ever got appointed into office.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you referring to the disenfranchised voters of Florida.
    Even the liberal media wouldn't say that is true, besides he "really" got elected in 04.

    Do you have any kids?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Re: "Not everyone in the world is out to get us." Is it possible that President Bush is paranoid?

    This is abhorrent.

    In January it became public that Foreign Affairs Canada pubished a manual for its diplomats outlining the countries that use torture. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/18/world/main3728128.shtml) The United States was upset that it was on the list and in the end our foreign minister pacified the situation (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2008/01/19/torture-manual.html). If the information is true, which Bush's veto seems to imply, then I don't think the United State's spot on this list is undeserved. I understand the need to maintain good relations with our biggest trading partner and ally, but disagreement on this should be possible. After all, as the foreign minister said this list does not speak to Canada's position vis-à-vis the United States, it is simply information they felt diplomats needed to know.

    ReplyDelete